Post by account_disabled on Jan 31, 2024 5:41:35 GMT -5
The regulation of its markets, but also in its social and cultural life, guaranteeing the accumulation of wealth and its unequal distribution. Not because he is greedy, but because of his own accumulating dynamic that provides him with economic health and efficiency, his most appreciated value. Marx already sensed, and Engels even more so, that mechanization, today computerized robotization, could put an end to the industrial worker [iii]. For them, the contradiction that ended up causing the change in productive systems was located in the correspondence between the advance of productive forces and the suitability of the Production Relations that made use of them; Although the dualism of nineteenth-century materialism suggested a determinism of Marxist thought.
modern theories on the complexity of open systems allow us to rethink it, accepting theses more in line with experience, which lead us to more open deductions about the future of capitalism , how the chaotic and self-destructive Phone Number Database contexts, consistent with the contradiction enunciated by Marx and Engels applied to current capitalism and the development of new productive forces within it: automatisms of the markets, moved exclusively by non-cooperative desires and decisions, forms of accounting that do not They foresee external effects, such as the depletion of essential non-market resources, etc. The ineffectiveness of nation states to regulate markets, or to act on the external effects of consumption and production, such as climate change.
To subvert the mechanics of inequality , redistribution is not enough; it is necessary to act on the regulatory mechanisms of investment and consumption, components of the predistribution of wealth. The parameters of predistribution were for the Czech socialists of 1968 the bases of the alliance of the forces of labor and culture [iv], which would sustain the democratic struggle in the post-industrial century, an oversight that has made the forces that They claimed to defend socialism in Europe. Now, in addition to a technological revolution regulated by capitalism, we face the greatest ecological and climatic catastrophe in the history of humanity, the consequences of which can eliminate the moral dilemmas of capitalism, because, if we do not act, there will be no future.
modern theories on the complexity of open systems allow us to rethink it, accepting theses more in line with experience, which lead us to more open deductions about the future of capitalism , how the chaotic and self-destructive Phone Number Database contexts, consistent with the contradiction enunciated by Marx and Engels applied to current capitalism and the development of new productive forces within it: automatisms of the markets, moved exclusively by non-cooperative desires and decisions, forms of accounting that do not They foresee external effects, such as the depletion of essential non-market resources, etc. The ineffectiveness of nation states to regulate markets, or to act on the external effects of consumption and production, such as climate change.
To subvert the mechanics of inequality , redistribution is not enough; it is necessary to act on the regulatory mechanisms of investment and consumption, components of the predistribution of wealth. The parameters of predistribution were for the Czech socialists of 1968 the bases of the alliance of the forces of labor and culture [iv], which would sustain the democratic struggle in the post-industrial century, an oversight that has made the forces that They claimed to defend socialism in Europe. Now, in addition to a technological revolution regulated by capitalism, we face the greatest ecological and climatic catastrophe in the history of humanity, the consequences of which can eliminate the moral dilemmas of capitalism, because, if we do not act, there will be no future.